methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Purposedifferent
Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowLow
Timedifferent
30 min Setup, dann laufend1-4 Wochen15-45 min1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone1-61-3Nutzertraffic
Formatsame
AsyncAsyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
RAID Log, Status Report SourceExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryADR File, Decision Log, RationaleInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note
Tagsno overlap
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Add more methods