View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Team Design Team API |  Agile Working Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 2-4 h | Half day initial, dann laufend | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-12 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Team API Document | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | TeamCollaborationAgile |