View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Agile Specification by Example |  Operations ABC Analysis |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 60-90 min pro Feature | 30-60 min | 20-40 min pro Story |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-6 | 1-5 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development |