methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper radar with five axes, two current and target profiles, and evidence cards beside each dimension.
Decision Making
Radar
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Paper illustration for Evaporating Cloud.
Systems Thinking
Evaporating Cloud
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Purposedifferent
When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do.Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h0.5-3 Tage60-120 min60-180 min
Participantsdifferent
2-105-152-84-20
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action AreasRich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change AgendaConflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next ExperimentsCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes
Tagsno overlap
AssessmentPortfolioCapability
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
Add more methods