View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Delivery RAID Log |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 90-180 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 4-12 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |