View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Product Strategy OKRs |  Business Strategy Strategy Map |  Engineering Goal Question Metric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When strategic direction needs to become measurable, it connects ambition with checkable results. It makes goals connectable to focus and review. | A Strategy Map translates strategy into a few connected objectives across perspectives such as finance, customers, processes, and learning. This makes visible which capabilities and activities are meant to drive which results. | Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 1-2 h Setup | 2-4 h workshop plus review | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 2-20 | 4-10 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | OKR set, Measurement plan, Review cadence | Strategy Map, Objective Set, Cause-Effect Hypotheses | GQM Table, Metric Profiles |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | GoalsAlignmentOutcomesMeasurement | AlignmentExecutionGoalsCausality | MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment |