View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Systems Thinking Leverage Points |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | Half day | 45-90 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-12 | 3-12 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Leverage Map, Action Strategy | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy | ChangeDecisionStrategy | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability |