methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper radar with five axes, two current and target profiles, and evidence cards beside each dimension.
Decision Making
Radar
Paper illustration for Future Reality Tree.
Systems Thinking
Future Reality Tree
Iceberg Model method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Iceberg Model
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do.A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation.The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-2 h2-4 h30-60 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
2-103-82-103-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action AreasFuture Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved InjectionsIceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention IdeasCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
AssessmentPortfolioCapability
Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange
Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Add more methods