View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Agile Example Mapping |  Operations ABC Analysis |  Agile Three Amigos |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 30-60 min | 30-60 min | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-7 | 1-5 | 3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement |