View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Agile Example Mapping |  Operations ABC Analysis |  Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 30-60 min | 30-60 min | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-7 | 1-5 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |