methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper radar with five axes, two current and target profiles, and evidence cards beside each dimension.
Decision Making
Radar
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
Paper illustration of the McKinsey 7S Framework with seven connected fields
Business Strategy
McKinsey 7S
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do.When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h1-4 Wochen2-4 h1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
2-106-30 Experten3-124-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action AreasExpert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change ActionsAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
AssessmentPortfolioCapability
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods