methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper radar with five axes, two current and target profiles, and evidence cards beside each dimension.
Decision Making
Radar
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Purposedifferent
When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighHigh
Timedifferent
1-2 h60-180 min1-5 Tage0.5-3 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-104-204-125-15
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action AreasCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking NotesLogic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanRich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change Agenda
Tagsno overlap
AssessmentPortfolioCapability
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
Add more methods