View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Product Discovery Context Canvas |  Architecture Quality Attribute Workshop |  Architecture Architecture Inception Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When an environment of users, systems, and constraints is hard to grasp, it puts the context compactly on the table. It creates a clear reading of influence, boundary, and dependency. | A Quality Attribute Workshop translates quality requirements into concrete scenarios and architecture impulses. The method brings product, engineering, and operations to the same view of desired properties. | The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 2-4 h | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-10 | 5-15 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Context canvas, Open questions, Shared context notes | Quality Scenarios, Priority List, Architecture Concerns | Inception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | ContextFramingRequirementsCanvas | RequirementsArchitectureWorkshop | AlignmentArchitectureCanvas |