View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Product Discovery Context Canvas |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When an environment of users, systems, and constraints is hard to grasp, it puts the context compactly on the table. It creates a clear reading of influence, boundary, and dependency. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 1-3 Wochen | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-10 | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Context canvas, Open questions, Shared context notes | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | ContextFramingRequirementsCanvas | UX researchObservationContext | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas |