methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper radar with five axes, two current and target profiles, and evidence cards beside each dimension.
Decision Making
Radar
Paper illustration for ABC Analysis
Operations
ABC Analysis
Rich Picture workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Systems Thinking
Rich Picture
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Purposedifferent
When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do.With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention.A Rich Picture brings an unclear situation onto a shared drawing. It captures actors, tensions, information flows, and blind spots before the team jumps to solutions too early.Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-2 h30-60 min30-90 min1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-101-52-104-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action AreasABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control ListRich Picture, Problem Framing NotesLogic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan
Tagsno overlap
AssessmentPortfolioCapability
PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio
Systems thinkingSoft systemsFramingVisualization
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
Add more methods