methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of many question cards around one challenge
Facilitation
Question Burst
Paper illustration for World Café.
Facilitation
World Café
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
Purposedifferent
When a problem gets covered up too quickly with answers, Question Burst puts the better question at the center. The format opens the thinking space before the group commits to an interpretation.When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
15-30 min60-180 min20-45 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-812-100+1-88-80
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Question List, Reframed Challenge, Learning PromptsTable Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared QuestionsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesDiscussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions
Tagsno overlap
QuestionsReframingFacilitationSensemaking
FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
FacilitationDialogueLarge group
Add more methods