methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of many question cards around one challenge
Facilitation
Question Burst
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for CATWOE Analysis.
Systems Thinking
CATWOE Analysis
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Purposedifferent
When a problem gets covered up too quickly with answers, Question Burst puts the better question at the center. The format opens the thinking space before the group commits to an interpretation.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way.When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
15-30 min45-90 min45-90 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-83-103-83-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Question List, Reframed Challenge, Learning PromptsResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsCATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, ConstraintsDelegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements
Tagsno overlap
QuestionsReframingFacilitationSensemaking
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders
AutonomyRolesTeam
Add more methods