methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of many question cards around one challenge
Facilitation
Question Burst
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for 1-2-4-All.
Facilitation
1-2-4-All
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Purposedifferent
When a problem gets covered up too quickly with answers, Question Burst puts the better question at the center. The format opens the thinking space before the group commits to an interpretation.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
15-30 min45-90 min10-20 min20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
2-83-104-100+1-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Question List, Reframed Challenge, Learning PromptsResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsIdea List, Shared Insights, Emergent ThemesOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes
Tagsno overlap
QuestionsReframingFacilitationSensemaking
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
FacilitationInclusionIdeation
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
Add more methods