View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Architecture Quality Attribute Workshop | ![]() Architecture Views and Beyond | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Quality Attribute Workshop translates quality requirements into concrete scenarios and architecture impulses. The method brings product, engineering, and operations to the same view of desired properties. | Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 1-3 Tage | 15-45 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 5-15 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Quality Scenarios, Priority List, Architecture Concerns | Architecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | RequirementsArchitectureWorkshop | DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |



