View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture Quality Attribute Workshop |  Operations Gemba Walk |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  Operations Kaizen Event |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Quality Attribute Workshop translates quality requirements into concrete scenarios and architecture impulses. The method brings product, engineering, and operations to the same view of desired properties. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | For a tightly scoped process segment with noticeable waste, the method bundles shared energy for change. It suits situations that call for fast learning loops and visible adjustments. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 30-120 min | 30–60 min | 0.5-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 5-15 | 2-6 | 4-8 | 4-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Quality Scenarios, Priority List, Architecture Concerns | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Kaizen Charter, Waste List, Improvement Experiments, Standard Work Update |
Tagsno overlap | RequirementsArchitectureWorkshop | LeanObservationProcessOperations | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | LeanContinuous improvementOperations |