methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Quality Attribute Workshop workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Architecture
Quality Attribute Workshop
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper illustration for Risk Storming.
Architecture
Risk Storming
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Purposedifferent
A Quality Attribute Workshop translates quality requirements into concrete scenarios and architecture impulses. The method brings product, engineering, and operations to the same view of desired properties.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
2-4 h30-90 min60-90 min60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
5-151-64-124-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Quality Scenarios, Priority List, Architecture ConcernsDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListAnnotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action BacklogProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment
Tagsno overlap
RequirementsArchitectureWorkshop
DecisionTreeOptions
RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
Add more methods