View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture Quality Attribute Workshop |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Knowledge Modeling Knowledge Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Quality Attribute Workshop translates quality requirements into concrete scenarios and architecture impulses. The method brings product, engineering, and operations to the same view of desired properties. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 1-2 h | 15-45 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-15 | 1-8 | 1-3 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Quality Scenarios, Priority List, Architecture Concerns | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Knowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer Plan |
Tagsno overlap | RequirementsArchitectureWorkshop | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | KnowledgeMappingRisk |