methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Quality Attribute Workshop workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Architecture
Quality Attribute Workshop
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Purposedifferent
A Quality Attribute Workshop translates quality requirements into concrete scenarios and architecture impulses. The method brings product, engineering, and operations to the same view of desired properties.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
2-4 h15-45 min1-5 Tage1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
5-151-3Nutzertraffic1-4
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Quality Scenarios, Priority List, Architecture ConcernsADR File, Decision Log, RationaleInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View
Tagsno overlap
RequirementsArchitectureWorkshop
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
Add more methods