View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Product Kata |  Domain Modeling EventStorming |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  Domain Modeling Context Map |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Product Kata helps clarify customer problems, solution ideas, and evidence through a repeatable improvement routine. It captures direction, current metric, target metric, experiment notes, and learning. | When a domain consists of many events, rules, and states, it creates a shared modeling space for the team. It bundles language, flows, and boundaries before domain knowledge fragments into siloed views. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Wochen je Loop | 2-8 h | 1-3 h | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 5-12 | 2-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Direction, Current metric, Target metric, Experiment note, Learning report | Event Timeline, Ubiquitous Language, Boundaries, Open Questions | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Context Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary Notes |
Tagsno overlap | OutcomesDiscoveryLearningIterationCoaching | Domain-Driven DesignEventsDiscoveryWorkshop | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy |