methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
Views and Beyond method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Views and Beyond
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Purposedifferent
With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-3 Tage15-45 min30-120 min
Participantsdifferent
3-101-41-32-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogArchitecture Views, Cross-view Notes, RationaleADR File, Decision Log, RationaleObservation Notes, Improvement Ideas
Tagsno overlap
ProcessOperationsImprovement
DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
LeanObservationProcessOperations
Add more methods