View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Process Mapping |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Team Design Spotify Model Mapping |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 60–90 min | 90-180 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 2-8 | 5-15 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement Backlog | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | Spotify Model Map, Action List | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tagsno overlap | ProcessOperationsImprovement | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |