methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
Rich Picture workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Systems Thinking
Rich Picture
Incident Command workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Incident Command
Paper illustration for CATWOE Analysis.
Systems Thinking
CATWOE Analysis
Purposedifferent
With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.A Rich Picture brings an unclear situation onto a shared drawing. It captures actors, tensions, information flows, and blind spots before the team jumps to solutions too early.During an acute incident with several people involved, the method creates a clear leadership and communication structure. It reduces chaos when fast coordination and clean situational awareness are both needed at once.CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h30-90 minAs needed45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-102-104-153-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogRich Picture, Problem Framing NotesIncident Log, Action Tracker, Stakeholder UpdatesCATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, Constraints
Tagsno overlap
ProcessOperationsImprovement
Systems thinkingSoft systemsFramingVisualization
IncidentOperationsReliability
Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders
Add more methods