methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
Paper illustration for Kepner-Tregoe
Operations
Kepner-Tregoe
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.For a disturbance that's hard to pin down, the method cleanly separates problem, cause, and decision. It reduces mixing when symptoms allow several interpretations.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h2-8 h10-20 min daily15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
3-102-812-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogProblem Analysis, Decision Analysis, Risk PlanDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
ProcessOperationsImprovement
Problem solvingRoot causeDecisionOperations
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods