methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
Incident Command workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Incident Command
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Purposedifferent
With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.During an acute incident with several people involved, the method creates a clear leadership and communication structure. It reduces chaos when fast coordination and clean situational awareness are both needed at once.When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 hAs needed45-90 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-104-154-123-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogIncident Log, Action Tracker, Stakeholder UpdatesStarfish Board, Practice Changes, ExperimentsStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
ProcessOperationsImprovement
IncidentOperationsReliability
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
Add more methods