methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
Game Day workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Game Day
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for Root Cause Tree Analysis
Operations
Root Cause Tree Analysis
Purposedifferent
With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighHighMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 hHalber Tag2-6 h1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
3-105-203-102-8
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogSimulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated RunbooksFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsCause Tree, Evidence Notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
ProcessOperationsImprovement
ResilienceOperationsIncident
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Root causeTreeIncidentQuality
Add more methods