methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Purposedifferent
With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h10-20 min daily45-90 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-1014-123-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesStarfish Board, Practice Changes, ExperimentsStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
ProcessOperationsImprovement
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
Add more methods