methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Purposedifferent
With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-4 Wochen45–75 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-101-6Team members involved3-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
ProcessOperationsImprovement
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
Add more methods