methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration for Eat the Frog
Operations
Eat the Frog
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h45-90 min15-90 min daily15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
3-102-512-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisPriority Task, Completion Note, Daily FocusRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
ProcessOperationsImprovement
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods