View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Problem Interview | ![]() Business Strategy VRIO Framework | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Product Discovery Experiment Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | The VRIO Framework rates resources and capabilities on whether they are Valuable, Rare, Inimitable, and Organized. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and courses of action. The result is captured as a VRIO table and strategic actions. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 90-180 min | 1-2 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 3-6 | 2-8 | 1-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | VRIO Table, Strategic Actions | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Completed Experiment Canvas, Success Metric |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | StrategyDiagnosisBusiness modelCapability | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis |



