methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min je Interview45-75 min1-2 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews2-810-30Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsTest Matrix, Test PlanClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tags1 shared
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods