methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration of Riskiest Assumption Test with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Riskiest Assumption Test
Purposedifferent
When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.When an idea hinges on one critical unknown, it prioritizes testing that exact piece of uncertainty first. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritized list of assumptions, a test plan, and a result report.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min je Interview1-2 Tage1-5 Tage1-2 Wochen pro Iteration
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews10-30Nutzertraffic2-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning DecisionPrioritized Assumption List, Test Plan, Results Report
Tags1 shared
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryAssumptions
Add more methods