View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  Agile Example Mapping |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 30-60 min | 1-4 Wochen | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 3-7 | 3-10 Kunden | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |