methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Empathy Mapping
UX Research
Empathy Mapping
Paper illustration of a Learning Card with four fields for hypothesis, observation, insight, and action.
Product Discovery
Learning Card
Paper illustration of Riskiest Assumption Test with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Riskiest Assumption Test
Purposedifferent
When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing.The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible.When an idea hinges on one critical unknown, it prioritizes testing that exact piece of uncertainty first. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritized list of assumptions, a test plan, and a result report.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min je Interview30–60 min25-40 min1-2 Wochen pro Iteration
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews4-81-52-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsEmpathy Map, Assumptions List, Research GapsLearning Card with evidence and next actionPrioritized Assumption List, Test Plan, Results Report
Tagsno overlap
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryAssumptions
Add more methods