View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  Decision Making Cynefin Workshop |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 60-180 min | 1-4 Wochen | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 4-20 | 3-10 Kunden | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Cynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | ComplexitySensemakingDecision | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | SensemakingDecisionRationale |