View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  Architecture C4 Model |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Architecture arc42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-4 h | 1-4 Wochen | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 1-5 | 3-10 Kunden | 1-4 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication |