View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Problem Framing Workshop |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Decision Making RAPID |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team works on symptoms but the real question stays fuzzy, a Problem Framing Workshop sharpens the view of the right problem. It separates observation, interpretation, and target picture from each other. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 3-10 | 3-12 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Scope Boundaries, Assumption List, Next Analysis Questions | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | RAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationAlignmentDiscovery | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | DecisionRolesGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |