View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Problem Framing Workshop |  Decision Making DACI |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team works on symptoms but the real question stays fuzzy, a Problem Framing Workshop sharpens the view of the right problem. It separates observation, interpretation, and target picture from each other. | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 30-60 min | 45-90 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 2-10 | 3-10 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Scope Boundaries, Assumption List, Next Analysis Questions | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationAlignmentDiscovery | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |