methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Pretotyping with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Pretotyping
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Purposedifferent
Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
Stunden bis wenige Tage1-2 Tage1-2 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-4Based on research question10-30Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decisionFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note
Tagsno overlap
ValidationDemandMVP
Information architectureNavigationFindability
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Add more methods