methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Pretotyping with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Pretotyping
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Stunden bis wenige Tage20-35 min45-75 min1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-41-52-8Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decisionTest Card with a pre-set thresholdTest Matrix, Test PlanClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tags1 shared
ValidationDemandMVP
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods