methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Pretotyping with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Pretotyping
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Purposedifferent
Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighLow
Timedifferent
Stunden bis wenige Tage20-35 min1-4 Wochen1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-41-51-6Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decisionTest Card with a pre-set thresholdExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note
Tags1 shared
ValidationDemandMVP
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Add more methods