methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Pretotyping with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Pretotyping
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Stunden bis wenige Tage30-60 min je Interview3-14 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-45-10 Interviews50+Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decisionSolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesSurvey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tags1 shared
ValidationDemandMVP
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
QuantitativeResearchValidation
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods