methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Pretotyping with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Pretotyping
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Purposedifferent
Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumHigh
Timedifferent
Stunden bis wenige Tage1-5 Tage1-3 h1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
1-4Nutzertraffic1-51-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decisionInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteFunnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypothesesExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary
Tagsno overlap
ValidationDemandMVP
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Add more methods