methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Pretotyping with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Pretotyping
Paper illustration for Risk Storming.
Architecture
Risk Storming
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data.Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
Stunden bis wenige Tage60-90 min1-5 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-44-12NutzertrafficNutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decisionAnnotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action BacklogInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tags1 shared
ValidationDemandMVP
RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods