View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Pretotyping | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Product Discovery Assumption Mapping | ![]() Product Discovery Smoke Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Stunden bis wenige Tage | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 45-60 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1-4 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 2-8 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decision | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationDemandMVP | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth |



