methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Pretotyping with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Pretotyping
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Stunden bis wenige Tage90-180 min120 min initial, dann laufend1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-43-63-6Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decisionGQM Table, Metric ProfilesHEART-GSM Table, DashboardClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
ValidationDemandMVP
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods